Learning · Community report
Get a daily content digest
Get a daily content digest. Have it read your bookmarks and likes, then send a short morning list.
What you can get
Reaches your accounts Creates or changes things in accounts you connect, with your approval.
-
It does
- Reads your bookmarks and likes on the platform you connect
- Sends you a daily list; does not post or like anything on your behalf
-
It stops and asks
- Before it starts: agree on how many items and what time the digest arrives.
- After the first week: review whether the picks actually match your interests.
- If picks drift: tell it which ones missed and why.
-
You approve
- Read-only access unless you decide to grant more
Derived from this task's own brief and steps, not from the source.
- Grant read accessStops for your approval
Bookmarks and likes on the platform you choose.
- Set the digest shape
Number of items and delivery time.
- Run it for a week
Let a real pattern of mornings build up before judging.
- Correct the matchesStops for your approval
Flag one-off saves so they stop reappearing.
Editorial, not from the source
Works when
- You already bookmark or like things consistently enough to signal a pattern.
- You want a short daily list rather than an open-ended feed.
- You're willing to give it a week before judging the matches.
Does not work when
- Your bookmarks are a grab-bag with no consistent theme.
- You want it to post, reply, or engage rather than just summarize.
- You need the digest to cover platforms it doesn't have access to.
Daily content digest: setup template
| Item | Based on | Status |
|---|---|---|
| [Digest length] | [Your stated preference] | [Confirmed] |
| [Delivery time] | [Your stated preference] | [Confirmed] |
| [Match quality] | [A week of real digests] | [Under review] |
The source case
On X, @lilfuwa reports asking Instinct to look at their bookmarks and likes to learn what kind of content they enjoy, then send a daily morning digest of similar posts. The author calls the result 'pretty good' so far. The post is a single short account with no detail on how many items the digest includes, how long it has been running, or whether any post was mismatched. Checked on 2026-10-09 as a single report.
A public report by someone outside this library. Not independently reproduced here.
From the source
Source excerpt
asked Instinct to look at my bookmarks/likes to see what type of content i like and send me tweets every morning. so far, it’s been pretty good!
Quoted from the original posts. Not written by this guide, and not a result produced here.
Suggested prompt
Bring The platform to read bookmarks and likes from, How many items you want per digest. Acts Reads your bookmarks and likes on the platform you connect. Sends you a daily list; does not post or like anything on your behalf. Source community report, checked 2026-10-09.
Written by this guide as a starting point, not quoted from the source. Your edits stay in this browser.
Other ways to ask
Editorial rewrites of the brief above, for a different emphasis. Copy them separately.
What you need
Editorial, not from the source
You supply
- The platform to read bookmarks and likes from
- How many items you want per digest
Connected
- Read access to your bookmarks/likes
- A way to receive the daily message
How to try it
Editorial, not from the source
- Give it access to your bookmarks or likes on the platform you want covered.
- Say roughly how many items you want each morning and at what time.
- Let it run for a week before judging the matches; one day's picks aren't a pattern.
- Tell it directly when a pick misses so the next batch can adjust.
Read the pattern, not just the list
A bookmark or like is a signal, but not always a clean one: some are a lasting interest, others a one-time save of something you meant to read once and never again. Before asking for a digest, it helps to think about which of your own bookmarks fall into each group, because the agent is inferring that split from the same raw list you'd be looking at. The reported setup didn't specify how that distinction was handled, which is exactly the kind of thing worth watching in your own first week: does the digest keep surfacing a topic you only cared about once? If so, that's useful feedback to give directly, not a sign the whole approach has failed.
Keep the output small and scheduled
The value of a digest like this comes from it being short enough to actually read every morning, not from covering everything your bookmarks could theoretically suggest. Decide a number up front, a handful rather than a feed, and a rough time you want it to land, so the task has a concrete target rather than an open-ended instruction to 'send me good stuff.' The reported account says the result has been good so far, without stating how many items or how long it ran, so there's no benchmark to copy exactly; set your own and adjust after a week of real mornings rather than guessing at an ideal number before you've seen any actual output land in your inbox or messages.
Separate reading from acting
This task, as reported, is about surfacing content for you to read, not about the agent engaging with it on your behalf. Keep those separate explicitly: read-only access to bookmarks and likes, and a digest sent to you, with no liking, replying, or reposting unless you ask for that separately, as a different task with its own permissions. That boundary matters more as the setup runs longer and becomes something you stop actively supervising day to day. A digest that quietly starts interacting with posts in your name is a different, larger thing than the one described in the original report, and it's worth noticing early if it happens rather than discovering it weeks later from your own activity history.
Open Instinct to try it. That is the product's own site; this guide is not part of it.
Limits and confirmation points
- One short report with no detail on digest length, run duration, or mismatches.
- Matching 'similar' content depends on reading your bookmarks and likes correctly; it can misread a one-off save as a standing interest.
- Covers one platform's bookmarks as described; it does not say whether multiple platforms were combined.
- No outcome is given beyond general satisfaction, so treat the match quality as unverified until you've run it yourself.
Editorial, not from the source
- Before it starts: agree on how many items and what time the digest arrives.
- After the first week: review whether the picks actually match your interests.
- If picks drift: tell it which ones missed and why.
Editorial, not from the source
- The digest keeps surfacing one-off saves as a theme
- Tell it which bookmark was a one-time save, not a standing interest, so it stops weighting it.
- The digest is too long or too short
- Restate the number of items you want; this is a preference setting, not a quality issue.
- It starts engaging with posts instead of just listing them
- Restate that the task is read and summarize only, with no liking, replying, or reposting.
Common questions
Can Instinct build me a daily reading digest?
One user reports asking it to read their bookmarks and likes and send a daily digest of similar posts, calling the result good so far. This directory has not reproduced it.
How does it know what I'm interested in?
From your existing bookmarks and likes. It's reading a pattern in what you've already saved, which can mistake a one-off save for a standing interest.
How many items should the digest include?
The report doesn't say. Pick a small number yourself, a handful rather than a feed, and adjust after a week of actual mornings.
Will it like or reply to posts for me?
Not as described here. The task is reading and summarizing; engaging on your behalf would be a separate, larger permission.
How long before I know if it's working?
Give it at least a week. One day's picks aren't a pattern, and the reported satisfaction doesn't specify a timeframe either.
Next
The only learning task here so far. The other categories.
Get recurring task recommendations — ask your own agent to check for relevant updates.